My head spinneth, having been moved by an unmoved mover. I read the Anselm because, you know, I was interested, and...why not?
It's interesting to me that the proposition seems to hang on the issue of things being impossible. This leads to this leads to this which can't be true - it's obviously impossible. We seem to set about saying that the root of all philosophy is in eliminating contradictions.
I'm not saying that contradictions are necessarily good, but I'm not saying they're necessarily bad, either.
"And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare
As any she belied with false compare,"
"I hate and I love - why I cannot say.
But it is so, and I am in torment."
That's human life - there are contradictions, paradoxes, things that don't make sense. I understand the philosophical drive to combat contradiction and impossibility, but every once in a while, I suspect that a logical impossibility captures the essence of a thing much better than any book of sensical descriptions ever could.
Which may, of course, be why I believe in God. God is not a good explanation for the contradictions, and He contradicts a good few things by his existence, but He does say: mystery is necessary and good. Theologize, but don't get so caught up in thinking about Me that you forget what you and I are up to. We have work to do, you see.
And I'm down with that.
Social Media Links
2 years ago